When you are not happy about something there are probably a dozen or more potential causes. Its usually easy to jump to an idea which of these to blame. But do we really know it is the main cause? And have we even thought about the other causes to see how much each of them is to blame?

I had this problem in a big way at work. A project wasn't working. Something big. All sorts of systems and processes and people weren't quite playing together nicely and the collective outcome was bad, bad, bad. Each team involved had an idea of what the problem was. Some blamed a system. Some blamed processes that weren't being followed. But the fascinating thing was than nobody involved could come up with a complete list of what all the root causes could be, and how much each was contributing to the poor performance. So we developed a guide (obscured because its confidential - sorry!):


This shows the three main measures of 'performance': What are the things we can measure to know whether performance is 'good' or 'bad'? It then lists the seven things that can cause performance to be bad. It has to be one of these and all should be investigated to understand poor performance. Finally it branches out in to a tree: If one of the seven things looks like its a cause, it shows you what to check next.

This was used to great effect recently by one of our projects. Things were looking bad. The overall results were terrible. I visited the country in question and they had used the principles from the root cause tree to really understand it. They could tell me straight away that although overall performance was poor, 60% was due to XXX, 20% due to YYY, 10% was ZZZ and the remainder was a bunch of smaller issues that weren't worth investigating. Amazing insight. We were then able to confidently and quickly focus our efforts on the real root cause.

Its not just boring work projects that would benefit from explanation in this way. I thought about what it is that makes me happy and came up with this:


... which immediately made me realise that I had got the balance wrong in daily life!!

I also thought about what makes me happy at work, and came up with this:
A little simpler than the life version, and a lot simpler than the one I did for work. But it gives me something to measure my job against and to judge other jobs by.

Finally I was looking back with frustration at political campaigns I have been involved in. The bits I was interested in is the gathering of data and the use of data to help increase the campaign's effectiveness. I sketched out a diagram with the overall thing I sought to achieve in campaigns at the top (Improved effectiveness and clear reporting on progress) and all of the things that were needed to achieve this. No campaign I have worked on had these elements. But I have also never seen a diagram with all of the elements on it before. So its not really a surprise that it was never achieved if nobody had ever clearly set out what needs to be achieved!

So all in all I have fallen in love with drawing root cause trees as a way to understand complex problems and thought I'd write a little blog post to share it. (Even though there are no numbers or charts involved.)

I guess the moral of this story is, if there is a complex problem out there with lots of things contributing to it, try listing them all and joining them with little arrows. It just may help to bring some clarity.
0

Add a comment

  1. I gave a talk at the Big Data Insight Group in London recently and they've just posted my talk online.


    I talk about how we've helped EMI Music make use of data and about how we're doing so in zeebox.

    One of the themes throughout my talk is the importance of people. Both in terms of how we use data to help people make decisions and about how we need to understand the people we're trying to help, in order to give them what we need. Technology enables this, but without the right people and without understanding people, technology is as good as useless.


    I also talk about how important skills and judgement are. And that, although it's sometimes seen as the things that drives decisions, it's usually or perhaps always used alongside skills and judgement. 


    I think that admitting to the role of skills and judgement isn't being 'anti-data'. I think that being honest about this enables and empowers us to better use data in the right ways. And it certainly helps people to feel comfortable with data, also!

    With the right people in place and data playing the right role in an organisation, the opportunity for data to help an organisation is massive. The way that EMI Music has embraced data across the organisation alongside skills and judgement shows that this is the case.


    0

    Add a comment

  2. We all know there are decisions where you need data to help you make them and there are decisions where data just isn't that important. This morning XKCD did a wonderful job of illustrating it. http://xkcd.com/1036/

    Buying a lamp is a creative decision. Turn your eye away from the reviews and go with your heart :)

    The same is true of many decisions data folks are asked to help with every day in organisations. We shouldn't be afraid to champion this strategy there, either!

    0

    Add a comment

  3. We sat down recently to talk data and insight. Here is what we talked about, plus a little video of me talking about insight at both zeebox and EMI.

    http://www.thebigdatainsightgroup.com/site/article/david-boyle-emi-zeebox-data-driven-includes-video
    0

    Add a comment

  4. I don't like the term 'scientist' as it makes the role sound unaccessible and elite. Google's Hal Varian said "the sexy job in the next ten years will be statisticians" ... but I don't like that term either. I'd replace 'statisticians' with 'working with data' or something ... and then I believe it!  I think data people have a tendency to overplay the role of the 'statistics' and magic of it and underplay the importance of the 'bringing it to life' and 'helping people understand / make use of it' parts of working with data.

    I thought about this because of this cool article in The Guardian about data scientists.

    As it points out, "science" is defined as "systematic study of natural or physical phenomena". I guess that's us all. Perhaps I shouldn't shy away from that phrase.

    The journalist describes the role well, as "someone who can bridge the raw data and the analysis - and make it accessible. It's a democratising role; by bringing the data to the people, you make the world just a little bit better." Perfect, eh?

    One last quote: "the four qualities of a great data scientist are creativity, tenacity, curiosity, and deep technical skills." That list sounds pretty good to me, also. So perhaps I should rename this the 'data scientist' blog and be done :)



    0

    Add a comment

  5. Some fun from http://fosslien.com/ via http://www.freakonomics.com/2012/02/29/the-life-of-the-number-crunching-analyst/


    I particularly like this one:

    0

    Add a comment

  6. So much data, so easily displayed in such a small but easy to understand format. I need say no more. I'm in love with the new sparlklines just made available in Google Spreadsheets: http://support.google.com/docs/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=2371371


    It's this simple:

    Google Spreadsheets is rapidly becoming my go to choice for building business dashboards. Bye, bye cost. Bye, bye developers (would be VERY sad not to work with them, of course). Bye, bye Microsoft!

    6

    View comments


  7. I spoke on a panel last night on the subject 'data as the new black gold'. There are three challenges I think this metaphor poses to the data world.







    First, that of crude oil. Data is everywhere in organisations, but too often left in it's crude form: gloopy and unusable. The oil industry had to work this out before it could be mainstream. It had to refine oil to a form that works for consumers day-to-day and it had to make it available to consumers in ways that fitted in to their daily life. It's trivial to stop by a petrol station and pick up some oil in a format you can instantly make use of. Data doesn't yet work the same way: it's rare to find an organisation that appropriately refines it and then makes it available to it's people in a way they can access and make use of as part of their day-to-day work.


    Second, I think we need to demand higher 'miles per gallon' from our data. Often we gather fantastic raw data, capable of being a really powerful part of decision making ... but then business leaders don't ask interesting questions of it. They don't demand smart analysis and challenge the data to offer insight. It's like demanding that cars offer higher miles per gallon from the oil they are burning.


    Finally, I think we need to embrace hybrid technology. In cars that's about oil being only part of the story for how the car gets powered. In data it's about saying that data is only part of the story for how organisations get powered. We need to be honest and bold about the role of skills & judgement alongside data in powering organisations. Too many people believe / pretend that data alone can power organisations to greatness. Everything I've seen tells me that data is necessary but not sufficient: smart people to use the data alongside their expertise is ALWAYS required. The data world should be honest about this and build data and systems around that truth. I've always found that has a much greater impact :)
    0

    Add a comment

  8. I've used a lot of word clouds recently. But I think of them as charts really, since they are still pretty faithful to the underlying data. The size of the word is proportional to the number of times that word is in the data set. Simple.

    But reading a cool data visualization book I came across this. Really it not based on 'data', but it's interesting his words and their location on the page conveys such a lot of information. Perhaps some good, well placed words can replace the need to chart actual data?

    http://creativeroots.org/2011/03/italy-infographic-map/
    0

    Add a comment

  9. Simple, easy to read, but really powerful. Nice little sparklines spotted in the papers from the 20 week scan my wife just had. Cool little chart like this should be everywhere!

    And by the way, it's a boy!
    0

    Add a comment

Labels
If you like this you'll like:
Info Clarity Archive
Loading